AIRecruiter.co logoAIRecruiter.co
ResearchThe IndexMarket MapPricingGet access
ResearchThe IndexMarket MapPricing
Get access

The Index

The talent market, tracked since 2000.

The AIRecruiter.co Index is the top layer of our research. It has three parts: a set of trackers that follow the most important metrics year by year, a searchable library of sourced statistics, and the research behind them. Every number traces to a real source. We never publish a figure we cannot point you to.

Trackers
6
Tracked since
2000
Statistics
107
Cited sources
190

Trackers current through 2026 · each statistic carries its own as-of date

Trackers

6 metrics

6 key metrics, measured the same way every year since 2000. The long-run shape of the talent market, with a graph for each.

Statistics

107 figures

Headline numbers distilled from our deep-dive reports, each one wired to its primary source and searchable.

Research

Deep dives

The reports the figures come from: full analysis, methodology, and the evidence trail behind every claim.

01The trackers

6 metrics, one window: 2000–2026.

A statistic is a snapshot. A tracker is the whole film. Each of these follows one dimension of the talent market the same way every year, so you can see it move through two recessions, a pandemic, and the tightest hiring market on record. The numbers are official Bureau of Labor Statistics series, pulled from FRED, with the latest 2026 reading on the end.

Snapshot compiled July 2026 · each series shows its own latest reading

Labor market slackVerified

Unemployment rate

How much slack is in the labor market. Low means a tight, candidate-short market; high means employers hold the leverage.

4.2%
2026 · latest
+0.2 ptssince 2000
Peak
9.6% ’10
Low
3.6% ’23
2000
4.0%

Two shocks define the span: the 2009 financial crisis (9.6% peak in 2010) and the 2020 pandemic (8.1% annual).

SourceU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, via FRED (2026)

Annual average, 2000-2025 · United States · 2026 is the latest reading (June 2026), not a full-year average.

Related research
  • The entry-level hiring collapse
Talent supplyVerified

Labor force participation

The share of working-age people who are in the workforce. It is the size of the talent pool every employer is fishing in.

61.5%
2026 · latest
-5.6 ptssince 2000
Peak
67.1% ’00
Low
61.5% ’26
2000
67.1%

A structural decline: from 67% in 2000 toward the low-60s, driven by retirements and a falling prime-age return after 2020.

SourceU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, via FRED (2026)

Annual average, 2000-2025 · United States · 2026 is the latest reading (June 2026), not a full-year average.

Related research
  • The entry-level hiring collapse
  • Skills-based hiring in 2026
Hiring demandVerified

Job openings rate

Open jobs as a share of all filled-plus-open positions. The cleanest read on how hungry employers are to hire.

4.6%
2026 · latest
+1.4 ptssince 2001
Peak
6.9% ’22
Low
1.9% ’09
2001
3.2%

JOLTS begins in December 2000, so this series starts in 2001. The 2021-2022 spike to 6.9% was the tightest hiring market on record.

SourceU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, JOLTS, via FRED (2026)

Annual average, 2001-2025 · United States · 2026 is the latest reading (May 2026), not a full-year average.

Related research
  • Hiring effort benchmarks by function
Worker mobilityVerified

Quits rate

The share of workers voluntarily quitting each month. It is a confidence gauge: people quit when they believe they can do better.

1.9%
2026 · latest
-0.3 ptssince 2001
Peak
2.8% ’22
Low
1.3% ’09
2001
2.2%

The 2021-2022 peak (2.8%) was the Great Resignation. The slide back toward 2.0% marks a cooler, employer-favored market.

SourceU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, JOLTS, via FRED (2026)

Annual average, 2001-2025 · United States · 2026 is the latest reading (May 2026), not a full-year average.

Related research
  • Talent marketplaces to 2028
Staffing industryVerified

Staffing industry employment

Jobs in temporary help services: the recruiting industry's own headcount, and a leading indicator economists watch for turning points.

2.50M
2026 · latest
-138Ksince 2000
Peak
3.09M ’22
Low
1.82M ’09
2000
2.64M

Temp staffing leads the cycle: it fell first into both recessions and peaked at 3.09M jobs in 2022 before the post-boom unwind.

SourceU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, via FRED (2026)

Annual average, 2000-2025 · United States · 2026 is the latest reading (June 2026), not a full-year average.

Related research
  • Staffing and agency tech outlook
  • Talent marketplaces to 2028
Cost of talentVerified

Cost of talent

Average hourly earnings for production and nonsupervisory workers: the going price of labor, and the budget line every hiring plan runs into.

$32.38
2026 · latest
+$18.37since 2000
Peak
$32.38 ’26
Low
$14.01 ’00
2000
$14.01

Wages more than doubled over the span. The 2020 jump is partly a composition effect: lower-paid workers left payrolls first, lifting the average.

SourceU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, via FRED (2026)

Annual average, 2000-2025 · United States · 2026 is the latest reading (June 2026), not a full-year average.

Related research
  • EU pay transparency
  • Hiring effort benchmarks by function

02The statistics

Every figure, searchable and sourced.

Where the trackers follow a metric over time, these are the point-in-time figures distilled from our reports. Filter by topic and confidence, sort by topic or recency, expand any figure for its source, and pin figures to compare them.

107 statistics

AI in HiringVerified
10%as of 2026

Agencies with full-workflow agentic AI

Only about one in ten agencies have implemented agentic AI across their entire workflow, signaling early-stage end-to-end automation.

SourceBullhorn
AI in HiringVerified
85%as of 2024

AI models favoring white-associated names

University of Washington study of over 3 million resume-job comparisons found leading text-embedding models favored white-associated names 85% of the time.

female-associated names favored only 11% of the time

SourceUniversity of Washington (2024)
AI in HiringReported
5.4%as of April 2026

AI-related share of US job postings

Well past the prior 3.3% peak in 2022, showing AI-building work climbing as entry-level demand falls.

up from the prior 3.3% peak in 2022

SourceIndeed Hiring Lab (2026)
AI in HiringReported
85%as of May 2026

Audited AI systems clearing four-fifths impact ratio

Vendor self-reported audit data: most audited AI systems clear the 0.8 four-fifths threshold, but 15% fail at least one demographic test.

15% failed at least one demographic threshold

SourceWarden AI (2026)
AI in HiringReported
5%as of May 2026

Bias audits that test for age discrimination

Age, the protected class litigated in Mobley, is tested in only 5% of audits, the exact gap plaintiffs exploit.

vs 100% coverage for sex and race/ethnicity

SourceWarden AI (2026)
AI in HiringReported
24%as of March 2026

Coding share of Claude.ai conversations (top 10 tasks)

Anthropic's own usage data (a single-vendor self-report) shows AI concentrated in exactly the routine grunt-work that made up the junior task bundle.

'Modifying software to correct errors' alone is ~10% of enterprise API usage.

SourceAnthropic (2026)
AI in HiringReported
11%as of Jan 2023-Aug 2025

Entry-level demand drop per 10pt rise in AI exposure

Revelio's controlled regression isolates the exposure effect at the entry level, holding industry and time trend constant.

vs a 7% increase in non-entry-level demand for the same exposure rise

SourceRevelio Labs (2025)
AI in HiringReported
35%as of 2026

Entry-level jobs now requiring AI skills

The AI-fluency requirement is the clearest fingerprint of the entry-level role being redesigned around capability.

SourceCNBC Select (2026)
AI in HiringReported
7%as of 2026

EU AI Act max fine, share of global turnover

The most serious EU AI Act violations carry a ceiling of 7% of global annual turnover, or EUR 35 million, whichever is higher.

Or EUR 35 million, whichever is higher.

SourceHeroHunt.ai (2026)
AI in HiringVerified
81%as of 2026

Fewer profiles reviewed with LinkedIn Hiring Assistant

Recruiters using LinkedIn's Hiring Assistant review 81% fewer profiles to find a qualified match, showing the screening leverage of agentic tools.

Up from a 62% reduction cited by charter customers at the September 2025 launch.

SourceLinkedIn (Talent Solutions)
AI in HiringVerified
78%as of 2025

High-growth firms using AI in their ATS

Among staffing firms growing revenue more than 25%, 78% embed AI tools directly in their applicant tracking system.

SourceBullhorn
AI in HiringReported
48%as of 2026

Hiring managers preferring AI tools over training a 2026 grad

A vendor survey of a self-selected panel: read as expressed attitude, not measured hiring behavior.

45% restructuring so one senior with AI does the work of multiple juniors

SourcePR Newswire (2026)
AI in HiringReported
82%as of May 2026 (planned)

HR leaders planning to deploy agentic AI in HR

A steep forward indicator of agentic AI adoption in HR that makes vendor-side liability systemic.

SourceGartner (2025)
AI in HiringReported
45%as of May 2026

HR-tech vendors with independent third-party audit

Independent, court-defensible auditing is the exception; internal testing is far more common than the audit trail a court will demand.

just 20% meet all four responsible-AI practices

SourceWarden AI (2026)
AI in HiringVerified
43%as of 2025

Organizations using AI in HR

Nearly half of organizations now use AI for HR tasks, a sharp acceleration in mainstream adoption.

Up from 26% in 2024, a 65% year-over-year increase.

SourceSHRM (2025)
AI in HiringVerified
51%as of 2025

Organizations using AI to support recruiting

Just over half of organizations apply AI specifically to recruiting, a step ahead of broader HR adoption.

SourceSHRM (2025)
AI in HiringVerified
66%as of 2026

Recruiters increasing AI use for pre-screening

Two in three recruiters plan to expand AI in pre-screening interviews specifically, the leading AI use case.

SourceHR Dive
AI in HiringVerified
93%as of 2026

Recruiters planning to increase AI use

Nearly all talent acquisition professionals intend to expand their AI usage as hiring pressure intensifies.

SourceHR Dive
AI in HiringVerified
52%as of 2026

Talent leaders adding autonomous AI agents

More than half of talent leaders plan to deploy autonomous AI agents on their teams this year, marking the move from copilots to agents.

SourceKorn Ferry
AI in HiringVerified
4xas of 2026

Top staffing firms vs peers on AI use

The highest-performing staffing firms are four times more likely to leverage AI than their peers, tying AI use to growth.

SourceBullhorn
AI in HiringVerified
20%as of 2025

Workload cut for recruiters using GenAI

Recruiters using generative AI report a 20% drop in workload, equivalent to recovering one full workday every week.

SourceLinkedIn (Future of Recruiting 2025)
Hiring SpeedVerified
45 daysas of 2025

Median time to fill across all roles

The median time to fill a role holds at about a month and a half, the broad benchmark hiring teams plan against.

SourceSHRM (2025)
Hiring SpeedVerified
15 daysas of 2026

Technical roles take longer to fill

Technical roles take roughly 15 days longer to fill than business roles, a gap teams should budget for in headcount planning.

SourceAshby
Hiring SpeedReported
40%as of 2026

Time-to-hire cut with AI screen plus human interview

Combining AI screening with human-led final interviews is reported to cut time-to-hire by 40% while improving retention, though the figure lacks a confirmable primary study.

SourceSelectSoftware Reviews
Hiring SpeedVerified
56%as of 2026

Top-growth firms placing in under 10 days

Over half of the fastest-growing staffing firms report average placement times under ten days, linking speed to growth.

SourceBullhorn
Hiring VolumeReported
88%as of 2025

AI and machine-learning hiring growth year over year

Demand did not vanish so much as reallocate up the skill curve, even as overall entry-level tech hiring fell sharply.

SourceQuasa (2025)
Hiring VolumeVerified
13.6%as of 2025

Fiverr active buyer base decline

Fiverr's active buyer base fell 13.6% to 3.1 million, a signal of softening volume on horizontal freelance marketplaces.

Down from 3.6 million active buyers a year earlier.

SourceFiverr International Ltd.
Hiring VolumeReported
40%as of Jan 2023-Aug 2025

Highly AI-exposed entry-level postings decline

The most-cited number in the 2026 entry-level debate, showing the slowdown was concentrated where AI can do the work.

vs a 33% decline for low-exposed entry-level roles

SourceRevelio Labs (2025)
Hiring VolumeReported
7%as of 2024

New-grad share of Big Tech new hires

Down about 25% from 2023 and more than 50% below the pre-pandemic 2019 level of roughly 15%.

down from roughly 15% in 2019 and 9% in 2023

SourceSignalFire (2025)
Hiring VolumeModeled estimate
5.6%as of 2026 (projected)

Projected rise in Class-of-2026 new-grad hiring

A sharp intentions upgrade from +1.6% projected the previous fall, concentrated in large AI-exposed firms.

up from +1.6% projected the previous fall

SourceNACE (2026)
Hiring VolumeReported
55,000as of 2025

US layoffs in 2025 citing AI as a factor

Small against total annual separations in the millions, supporting skeptics on raw layoffs; the mechanism works through frozen hiring not firing.

attribution contested and self-serving

SourceCNBC (2025)
Talent SupplyVerified
291as of Q1 2026

Applications per hire

It now takes roughly 291 applications to make one hire, a flood that reshapes screening economics.

Tripled from about 100 in early 2021.

SourceAshby (2026)
Talent SupplyReported
273as of 2026

Applications per tech internship posting, Class of 2026

A measure of funnel congestion pushing employers toward automated screening at the first cut.

SourceCNBC Select (2026)
Talent SupplyVerified
35%as of 2025

B2B sales annual turnover

B2B sales teams churn around 35% of staff a year, keeping sales among the highest-replacement functions to source for.

SourceXactly (citing HubSpot)
Talent SupplyReported
6.1%as of 2026

Computer science recent-grad unemployment rate

Among the highest of any field, yet CS grads land degree-appropriate roles far more reliably (underemployment near 19%).

underemployment near 19% vs 41.5% overall recent-grad figure

SourceVnExpress / NY Fed data (2026)
Talent SupplyReported
60%as of 2025

Entry-level software/IT postings requiring 3+ years experience

The rising experience bar makes 'entry-level' a misnomer and pushes the genuine entry point off the formal ladder.

reported as 60%+ of nominally entry-level postings

SourceCNBC (2025)
Talent SupplyReported
12%as of March 2026

Germany job postings with salary information

The EU's largest economy trails badly on disclosure while the non-EU UK leads at about 56%, showing behavior tracks culture and enforcement more than the letter of the law.

SourceIndeed Hiring Lab (2026)
Talent SupplyReported
12%as of mid-2023 to 2026

Grads 22-27 share of unemployment rise since mid-2023

Bachelor's grads aged 22-27 are only ~5% of the workforce but contributed a disproportionate share of the unemployment rise.

while making up only about 5% of the total workforce

SourceFortune (2026)
Talent SupplyModeled estimate
6.9%as of 2026 (projected)

Projected starting-salary rise for computer science grads

Rising pay for fewer seats is the wage-side fingerprint of a quality shift, not a demand collapse.

from +3.1% for engineering; social sciences the only decline at -1.7%

SourceNACE (2026)
Talent SupplyReported
5.5%as of March 2026

Recent college grad unemployment vs 4.4% overall

The historical college advantage has reversed: recent grads now carry higher unemployment than the broader workforce.

a 1.1-point gap above the 4.4% overall rate

SourceSHRM (2026)
Talent SupplyReported
16%as of 2025

Relative employment decline for AI-exposed workers 22-25

Stanford's ADP payroll analysis shows the youngest cohort in the most AI-exposed occupations fell relative to older colleagues in identical roles.

as low as 13% in some specifications; older workers in same occupations stable or growing

SourceStanford Digital Economy Lab (2025)
Talent SupplyReported
64%as of 2026

Remote work share of young-grad unemployment rise

A separate non-AI channel that shrinks the residual available for AI to explain in the youth-unemployment rise.

SourceCNBC (2026)
Sourcing ChannelsVerified
11,000as of 2025

LinkedIn applications per minute

LinkedIn processes about 11,000 job applications every minute, illustrating the AI-driven surge in application volume.

A 45% year-over-year increase as of mid-2025.

SourceeWeek
Sourcing ChannelsReported
58%as of 2025

Recruiters citing sourcing as top AI use

Among recruiters who use AI, 58% say candidate sourcing is its single most useful application, ahead of screening and nurturing.

SourceTidio
Recruiting Tech MarketModeled estimate
40%as of 2027

Agentic-AI projects Gartner expects to be canceled by 2027

A projection driven by escalating costs, unclear business value, and inadequate risk controls, a warning about deployment discipline rather than a verdict on the technology.

SourceGartner (2025)
Recruiting Tech MarketModeled estimate
24.8%as of 2024-2030 (projected)

AI-in-HR market CAGR to 2030

Grand View Research's headline 24.8% CAGR for the broader AI-in-HR market through 2030, measured from its 2023 base of $3.25B.

SourcePin (2025)
Recruiting Tech MarketModeled estimate
$5Bas of 2025

AI-in-HR market size

Grand View Research's sizing of the broader AI-in-HR market on its path to $15.24B by 2030, the scale that makes vendor liability a systemic rather than isolated concern.

on a 24.8% CAGR from a 2023 base of $3.25B to $15.24B by 2030

SourcePin (2025)
Recruiting Tech MarketVerified
$50Mas of 2025-07

Ashby Series D

ATS challenger Ashby raised a $50M Series D at roughly twice its prior valuation, capital fueling next-gen recruiting platforms.

SourceAshby
Recruiting Tech MarketVerified
11%as of 2025

ATS market-share leader

The leading applicant tracking system holds only about 11% market share, underscoring a highly fragmented ATS landscape.

SourceiCIMS (2025)
Recruiting Tech MarketVerified
28%as of 2025

Companies satisfied with their ATS

Only 28% of companies are satisfied with their current ATS, with 82% reporting significant gaps and one in four planning to replace it.

SourceEightfold AI
Recruiting Tech MarketModeled estimate
$6.01Bas of 2031 (projected)

Employee-onboarding identity verification market by 2031

The hiring-specific verification segment is the fast-growing edge of the category, projected to grow at 16.67% CAGR from $2.78B in 2026, faster than the overall IDV market's 11.18%.

16.67% CAGR from $2.78B in 2026

SourceMordor Intelligence
Recruiting Tech MarketModeled estimate
94%as of 2026

Employers expected to disclose pay ranges in postings

Mercer's global survey of 1,600-plus respondents projects near-universal range disclosure by end of 2026, a statement of employer intent that runs well ahead of measured behavior.

Projected rise from 60% in 2024

SourceMercer (2026)
Recruiting Tech MarketReported
4as of 2026

EU member states with pay-transparency law in force

Only 4 of 27 EU states (Slovakia, Italy, Lithuania, Malta) had complete transposition law on the 7 June 2026 deadline, making compliance a staggered multi-year calendar for cross-border employers.

23 of 27 states missed the deadline, including Germany and France

SourceTrusaic (2026)
Recruiting Tech MarketVerified
$51Mas of 2025-10

Findem Series C plus growth raise

Talent-data platform Findem closed $51M to expand its attribute-labeled talent dataset, a marker of investment flowing into AI sourcing.

SourceFindem
Recruiting Tech MarketModeled estimate
$650Bas of 2025

Global staffing market size

The global staffing market sits near $650 billion in 2025, rebounding modestly after a soft 2024.

Up roughly 5% from about $620B in 2024.

SourceStaffing Industry Analysts (SIA)
Recruiting Tech MarketVerified
$450Mas of 2026

LinkedIn agentic talent products run rate

Microsoft disclosed LinkedIn's agentic Talent Solutions products surpassed a $450M annualized run rate, proving real revenue behind recruiting AI.

SourceReuters (via Investing.com); Microsoft FY2026 Q3 earnings
Recruiting Tech MarketVerified
$10Bas of 2025-10

Mercor Series C valuation

AI talent marketplace Mercor raised a $350M Series C at a $10 billion valuation, a fivefold jump in eight months.

5x its $2B Series B valuation in February 2025.

SourceTechCrunch
Recruiting Tech MarketVerified
110as of Q3 2025

Talent-tech acquisitions in Q3 2025

The worktech sector recorded 110 acquisitions in Q3 2025, its largest quarterly volume on record amid 90-100 deals per quarter.

SourceVenero Capital (2025)
Recruiting Tech MarketModeled estimate
$3.7Bas of 2025

Total HR-tech investment

HR technology investment totaled roughly $3.7 billion in 2025 by one tracker, though estimates diverge sharply on direction.

Reported down 40% YoY by HRO Today, while other trackers show work-tech investment rising.

SourceHRO Today (HR Tech Report)
Recruiting Tech MarketModeled estimate
$178.7Bas of 2025

US staffing market size

The US staffing industry generated roughly $178.7 billion in 2025 per SIA's Americas forecast, the largest single-country staffing market.

SourceStaffing Industry Analysts (2030)
Recruiting Tech MarketReported
$2Mas of July 2025

Warden AI seed round on Mobley-driven audit demand

The bias-assurance layer is monetizing the exact liability the Mobley litigation created; Warden raised on surging independent-audit demand.

on top of roughly $1.6M in prior funding

SourceTech Funding News (2025)
Recruiting Tech MarketVerified
$1Bas of 2025

Workday acquisition of Paradox

Workday closed its roughly $1 billion all-cash acquisition of conversational-AI recruiter Paradox, a marquee consolidation move.

SourceWorkday
Recruiting Tech MarketVerified
$2.939Bas of FY2026 (ended Jan 31, 2026)

Workday FY2026 operating cash flow

Workday's audited balance sheet shows it can fund a multi-year Mobley defense, but also makes it the deepest-pocketed defendant the employment-AI bar has ever had.

up 19.4% year over year

SourceSEC (2026)
Contingent TalentReported
76%as of 2025

Companies using freelancers or contractors

Roughly 76% of companies now use freelancers or contractors to build more adaptable teams, though the figure lacks a traceable primary survey.

SourceStaffing Management Group
Contingent TalentVerified
$17.3Bas of 2025-10

Deel Series E valuation

Global contractor and payroll platform Deel raised a $300M Series E at a $17.3 billion valuation, having surpassed $1B in revenue run rate.

SourceTechCrunch
Contingent TalentVerified
$787.8Mas of 2025

Upwork annual revenue

Upwork booked a record $787.8 million in full-year 2025 revenue, the high-water mark for the largest freelance marketplace.

SourceU.S. SEC (Upwork Form 8-K)
Assessment & InterviewReported
83%as of 2025

Candidates who would use AI if undetected on assessments

The overwhelming majority would use AI assistance if they believed employers could not detect it, meaning any unproctored test measures restraint rather than skill.

SourceHackerRank (2025)
Assessment & InterviewReported
92%as of 2021-2025

Interview transcription (ASR) cost decline

The base capability of interview intelligence, transcription, is commoditizing: automatic speech recognition costs fell roughly 92% from 2021 to 2025, collapsing the floor under any product whose value stops at notetaking.

from about $0.25 to $0.02 per minute

SourceTool Directory (2026)
Assessment & InterviewReported
3Mas of 2025

Interviews captured by Metaview

The independent's defense against platform consolidation is specificity: Metaview reports capturing over three million interviews as the proprietary, recruiting-specific dataset behind its vertical hiring AI, on a $35M GV-led Series B.

$35M Series B (GV-led, 2025); 2,500+ customers

SourceFortune
Assessment & InterviewVerified
19.5as of 2026

Interviews per hire for data roles

Data roles average 19.5 interviews per hire, the most of any function, versus just 9.5 for customer support, the lowest.

SourceAshby (2026)
Assessment & InterviewReported
35%as of 2025

Proctored assessments flagged for cheating

Assessment fraud more than doubled in a single year, reaching 40 percent on entry-level tests and 48 percent in Asia-Pacific, breaking the unproctored take-home as a reliable skill signal.

Up from 16% in 2024

SourceCodeSignal (PR Newswire) (2025)
Assessment & InterviewReported
25%as of 2026

Retention lift with AI screen plus human interview

The combined AI-screening-plus-human-interview model is reported to lift first-year retention by 25%, a figure widely cited but lacking primary research.

SourceSelectSoftware Reviews
Assessment & InterviewReported
0.51as of 2016 meta-analysis

Structured-interview predictive validity

The selection science recruiting mostly ignored in practice: structured interviews predict job performance at about 0.51, far above unstructured, and the gap between knowing that and enforcing it is the entire reason interview intelligence exists as a category.

vs ~0.38 unstructured (as low as 0.20); ~0.63 combined with a general-mental-ability test

SourceUniversity of Baltimore
Assessment & InterviewReported
80%as of 2025

Unstructured interviews as the default format

Despite structure being the strongest lever on interview quality, SHRM research finds unstructured interviews remain the default at over 80% of organizations, the least predictive and most bias-prone format.

over 80%; the least predictive, most bias-prone format

SourceCogn-IQ
Assessment & InterviewReported
70Mas of 2026

Video interviews hosted by HireVue

The durable moat in interview intelligence is the proprietary, outcome-linked interview corpus. HireVue reports hosting over 70 million video interviews, the accumulated data asset that made it an acquirer rather than a target.

with 1,000+ validation studies; serves ~60% of the Fortune 100

SourceHireVue
Skills & MobilityVerified
37%as of 2024

Companies that genuinely followed through (leaders)

The real operating rate of skills-based hiring: 37 percent of announcers followed through while 45 percent changed nothing and 18 percent backslid, versus a 70 to 85 percent announcement rate.

vs 45% in-name-only and 18% backsliders

SourceThe Burning Glass Institute and Harvard Business School (2024)
Skills & MobilityReported
85%as of 2025

Employers claiming skills-based hiring

Self-reported adoption keeps climbing (NACE puts it tighter at 70 percent), but these are announcement rates, not evidence that hires actually changed.

Up from 81% in 2024; 53% say they eliminated degree requirements

SourceTestGorilla (2025)
Skills & MobilityModeled estimate
72%as of 2025

GM screening efficiency gain with AI

General Motors reported a 72% increase in screening efficiency using HiredScore AI, a flagship enterprise outcome for AI-assisted selection.

SourceWorkday (HiredScore customer story)
Skills & MobilityVerified
0.14%as of 2023

Hires actually affected by dropped degree rules

Fewer than 1 in 700 hires (about 97,000 of 77 million) were affected despite widespread degree-drop announcements, exposing the gap between claimed and real skills-based hiring.

About 97,000 of 77 million annual hires

SourceThe Burning Glass Institute and Harvard Business School (2024)
Skills & MobilityReported
75%as of 2025

Recruiters making skills-based hiring top priority

Three in four recruiters name skills-based hiring their top priority, the clearest signal of the shift away from credential-led selection.

SourceLinkedIn (Future of Recruiting)
Skills & MobilityReported
28%as of 2025

Salary premium for postings requiring AI skills

About $18,000; AI skills now appear in ~2.5% of US postings, up 55% year over year and 297% over a decade.

AI-skill mentions up 55% year over year and 297% over a decade

SourceLightcast (2025)
Candidate TrustReported
1,800as of Apr 2024-Dec 2025

Amazon job applications blocked as suspected DPRK-origin

The defensive front is now quantified: Amazon blocked over 1,800 suspected North Korean applications, with the attack volume still growing ~27% per quarter (roughly a tripling per year).

applications growing ~27% per quarter

SourceThe Register
Candidate TrustModeled estimate
25%as of 2028 (projected)

Candidate profiles projected to be fake

Gartner projects that by 2028 one in four candidate profiles worldwide will be fake, a looming verification challenge for hiring teams.

SourceGartner
Candidate TrustVerified
38%as of 2026

Candidates abandoning an AI interview process

38% of candidates have walked away from a hiring process because it included an AI interview, with another 12% saying they would.

SourceGreenhouse
Candidate TrustReported
30%as of 2026

Deepfake vendor's fraud find rate in flagged interview sessions

A vendor self-report to treat as suggestive, not authoritative: InCruiter found fraud in 25-30% of already-flagged sessions (not all interviews), which it said was nearly double what human interviewers caught.

denominator is flagged sessions, not all interviews

SourceSMEStreet
Candidate TrustModeled estimate
30%as of 2026 (projected)

Enterprises rating identity verification unreliable in isolation

Gartner's projection quantifies the detection gap: by 2026 nearly a third of enterprises no longer trust identity verification on its own against AI-generated deepfakes, forcing layered defenses.

SourceGartner
Candidate TrustReported
80.6Mas of H2 2024

Fake LinkedIn accounts removed at registration in 2H 2024

The synthetic-identity supply sitting upstream of every sourcing tool: LinkedIn caught tens of millions of fakes at the door in a single half-year, up from 70.1M prior.

up from 70.1M in the prior six months

SourceLinkedIn
Candidate TrustReported
91%as of 2025

Hiring managers who encountered suspected AI interview answers

A Greenhouse survey of more than 4,100 hiring managers found near-universal exposure to suspected AI-generated interview answers, a distinct signal from identity fraud.

SourceGreenhouse
Candidate TrustVerified
$365,000as of September 2023

iTutorGroup EEOC AI-discrimination settlement

The first EEOC AI-discrimination settlement, after software was programmed to auto-reject female applicants 55+ and male applicants 60+.

SourceEEOC (2023)
Candidate TrustReported
53%as of 2026

Job seekers ghosted by employers

A three-year high in candidate ghosting that rises as high-volume automated outreach degrades the experience and corrupts the pipeline agents were meant to build.

Up from 48% in 2025 and 38% in 2024

SourceFortune (2026)
Candidate TrustReported
$1.46Bas of 2026

Largest single crypto theft, executed via a compromised hire

The nightmare endpoint of the hiring-fraud kill chain: the record Bybit heist began by compromising a third-party developer's laptop and credentials.

SourceFortune
Candidate TrustReported
35%as of 2025

Managers who confirmed a proxy in a virtual interview

In Checkr's survey of 3,000 managers, more than a third confirmed someone other than the applicant took part in a virtual interview, a direct measure of the proxy problem.

31% interviewed a fake identity; 23% lost >$50K

SourceCheckr
Candidate TrustReported
62%as of 2025

Managers who say job seekers now out-fake HR's detection

The confidence gap is the core selling point of the whole verification category: managers believe candidates are better at faking than HR is at catching, and only 19% were extremely confident they could catch a fraud.

vs only 19% extremely confident they could catch it

SourceCheckr
Candidate TrustVerified
70as of 2026

Minutes to build a live-interview deepfake

A Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 researcher with no image-manipulation experience built a real-time deepfake synthetic identity able to pass a live video interview in 70 minutes, on a five-year-old consumer GPU with free tools.

70 minutes, no experience, free tools, five-year-old GPU

SourceUnit 42
Candidate TrustReported
95%as of 2026

Organizations that experienced a deepfake incident in prior year

HYPR's report shows even organizations with defenses are getting hit: near-universal deepfake exposure and nearly 40% suffering a GenAI-related breach.

nearly 40% had a GenAI-related breach

SourceHYPR
Candidate TrustReported
1.1Bas of relevant class period (billions)

Rejected applications in the Workday collective

The universe of rejections Workday represented to the court defines the scale of the nationwide collective, an order of magnitude no single-employer case has approached.

an order of magnitude no single-employer case has ever approached

SourceProskauer (Law and the Workplace) (2025)
Candidate TrustReported
200%as of 2023

Rise in biometric injection attacks in 2023

Injection attacks feed a synthetic stream straight into the verifier with no camera, defeating naive liveness checks, which is why presentation-attack detection alone is no longer sufficient.

SourceGartner
Candidate TrustVerified
$2Mas of 2024

SafeRent tenant-screening algorithm settlement

SafeRent settled a tenant-screening disparate-impact case for over $2 million, the structural template the hiring bar watches for algorithmic scoring claims.

SourceQuinn Emanuel (2024)
Candidate TrustReported
47%as of Apr 2025-May 2026

State-backed attacks on tech sector tied to North Korea

CrowdStrike attributed nearly half of all state-backed activity against the tech sector to North Korea-linked actors, tying the hiring-fraud pipeline directly to the broader cyber-threat picture.

SourceTechCrunch
Candidate TrustVerified
300as of 2025

US companies infiltrated in a single DPRK laptop-farm case

The Christina Marie Chapman case proved the fraud runs at industrial scale from US soil: a laptop farm placed DPRK workers at 300+ companies for $17M in illicit revenue.

over $17M in illicit DPRK revenue; 102-month sentence

SourceDOJ
Candidate TrustVerified
$501Mas of 2024

US job-scam losses reported to the FTC in 2024

The hardest, most auditable fraud number in the space: regulator-measured job-scam losses more than quintupled from $90M in 2020 as report volume tripled.

up from $90M in 2020

SourceFTC
People AnalyticsReported
30%as of 2026

Cost-per-hire reduction from AI in recruiting

The measured average return organizations actually get, alongside about 31% faster hiring, well below the up-to-70% ceiling vendors advertise.

SourceInCruiter (2026)
People AnalyticsVerified
11.1%as of 2024

EU unadjusted gender pay gap

The stubborn, near-flat gender pay gap the directive's reporting engine and 5% joint-assessment trigger exist to shrink.

Down from 14.4% in 2018 and 12.7% in 2021

SourceEurostat (2024)
People AnalyticsVerified
7.3as of Q1 2026

Hires per recruiter per quarter

Recruiter productivity recovered to about 7.3 hires per quarter, rebounding from a trough of 4.5 in early 2023.

Up from a 4.5 trough in early 2023.

SourceAshby (2026)
People AnalyticsVerified
56%as of 2026

Organizations not measuring AI ROI

Over half of organizations do not formally measure the success of their AI investments at all, a major governance and ROI gap.

SourceSHRM (2026)
People AnalyticsVerified
286as of Q1 2026

Recruiter call time per week

Recruiter call time hit 286 minutes per week, the highest on record and double the level of early 2024, a sign of high-touch hiring effort.

Doubled since Q1 2024.

SourceAmerican Staffing Association
People AnalyticsReported
54%as of 2025

US employers prepared for pay-transparency compliance

Even after years of state pay-transparency laws only about half of US employers felt ready, signaling European employers entering the same multi-quarter readiness lag.

Up from 39% in 2024

SourceMercer (2025)

The breakdowns behind the figures

Selected series and breakdowns from individual reports. Every chart names its source and links to the deep-dive that establishes it.

Recruiters using generative AI

Share of recruiters, by year

Verified

Up 10 points in a year, a ~37% increase in active use.

SourceLinkedIn (Future of Recruiting 2025)LinkedIn (Future of Recruiting)
Read the analysis

How talent teams use AI in hiring

Share of organizations using AI for each task

Verified
Writing job descriptions66%
Screening resumes44%
Automating candidate searches32%
Customizing job postings31%
Communicating with applicants29%

Adoption is broad on drafting tasks, thinner on decision-making ones.

SourceSHRM (2025)
Read the analysis

Interviews per hire, by function

Average interviews to make one hire

Reported
Data19.5
Product18
Engineering17.9
Sales12.8
Customer Support9.5

Technical roles carry roughly double the interview load of support roles.

SourceAshby
Read the analysis

AI-native hiring: notable funding rounds

Disclosed round size, 2025

Verified
Mercor (Series C)$350M
Findem (Series C)$51M
Micro1 (Series A)$35M
Metaview (Series B)$35M
Juicebox (Series B)$30M
ConverzAI (Series A)$16M

Capital is concentrating in AI-native sourcing and interviewing.

SourceTechCrunchFindemTechCrunchFortuneTechCrunchPR Newswire
Read the analysis

Postings Fell Hardest Where AI Exposure Was Highest

Decline in US job postings by seniority and AI-exposure level, Jan 2023 to Aug 2025

Reported
Entry-level, high AI exposure40%
Entry-level, low AI exposure33%
Non-entry-level, high AI exposure27%
Non-entry-level, low AI exposure16%

At the entry level, AI exposure widens the decline; the senior gap is smaller because senior workers wield the tools.

SourceRevelio Labs (2025)
Read the analysis

New Grads Are a Shrinking Share of Big Tech Hiring

Share of Big Tech new hires who were new graduates

Reported

The new-grad share of Big Tech hiring more than halved from its pre-pandemic level.

SourceSignalFire (2025)
Read the analysis

Hiring Intentions for the Class of 2026 Brightened Sharply

NACE projected year-over-year change in new-grad hiring

Modeled estimate
Class 2025 (final)7.3%
Class 2026 (Fall 2025)1.6%
Class 2026 (Spring 2026)5.6%
Class 2026, 5,000+ staff8.7%

Intentions swung from +1.6% in fall to +5.6% in spring, with the largest employers most bullish at +8.7%.

SourceNACE
Read the analysis

AI vs Human Hiring: Four-Fifths Impact Ratio

Average disparate-impact ratio across 150+ audits; 0.80 is the EEOC four-fifths threshold (higher is fairer)

Reported
Human baseline0.67
Four-fifths threshold0.8
Audited AI systems0.94

Audited AI systems clear the four-fifths screening heuristic on average while the human baseline falls below it.

SourceWarden AI (2026)
Read the analysis

What Bias Audits Actually Test: Protected-Class Coverage Gap

Share of 150+ HR-tech audits that tested each protected class (Warden AI)

Reported
Sex100%
Race / ethnicity100%
Age5%
Disability5%
Religion / orientation2%
National origin1%

Age and disability, the exact classes litigated in Mobley, are tested in only 5% of audits.

SourceWarden AI (2026)
Read the analysis

Responsible-AI Practices Are the Exception, Not the Rule

Share of HR-tech vendors meeting each governance practice (Warden AI)

Reported
Internal bias testing75%
Independent third-party audit45%
NYC LL144 compliance38%
All four responsible-AI practices20%

Internal testing is common but independent, court-defensible auditing is the exception.

SourceWarden AI (2026)
Read the analysis

What managers actually saw on hiring fraud

Share of managers reporting each experience in the past year (Checkr survey of 3,000 managers, 2025)

Reported
Suspected AI misrepresentation59%
Confirmed a proxy in interview35%
Interviewed a fake identity31%
Lost >$50K to hiring fraud23%
Extremely confident they'd catch it19%

The 40-point gap between suspicion (59%) and detection confidence (19%) is what every verification vendor sells against.

SourceCheckr
Read the analysis

Onboarding IDV is the fast-growing segment

Identity verification for employee onboarding vs total IDV market, USD billions (modeled forecast)

Modeled estimate
Onboarding IDV 2026$2.78B
Onboarding IDV 2031$6.01B
Total IDV 2026$15.78B
Total IDV 2031$26.8B

Onboarding IDV grows at 16.67% CAGR vs 11.18% for the overall market, the quantitative signal that hiring is the fast-growing edge.

SourceMordor IntelligenceMordor Intelligence
Read the analysis

03How to read the Index

Every figure carries a confidence label.

We separate what is measured from what is estimated. A number is only marked verified when we confirmed it against the primary source. The trackers are all verified government series; the statistics range from verified to modeled, and each says which.

Verified

42

Confirmed against the primary source.

Reported

52

Consistently reported by a credible publisher.

Modeled estimate

13

A market estimate or projection, not a measured figure.

Each statistic links down to the deep-dive report that establishes it and up to the original source. Read the full methodology for how we source, label, and reconcile every figure, browse the source registry behind every number, or take the whole Index as a machine-readable export.

Get access

Put the data to work.

A free account gives you the full benchmark terminal, every tracker and the series behind every chart, and the research library. Or request a briefing on a specific decision.

Get research accessRequest a briefing
AIRecruiter.co logoAIRecruiter.co

The independent research and intelligence firm for the talent economy. Market maps, research, and data on how the world hires.

Explore

  • Research
  • The Index
  • Market Map
  • Pricing

The firm

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Sources

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Contact

  • support@airecruiter.co
© 2026 AIRecruiter.co. All rights reserved.